More than three decades have passed since the Russian-backed Georgian-Abkhazian war, yet Georgian-Abkhazian relations remain a focal point of discussion, not only for politicians and sociologists but also for writers. Numerous authors have sought to reflect the dramatic events of 1992-1993, employing both dominant and alternative narratives. This article examines the works of Georgian and Abkhazian female authors from the 1980s-1990s generation who did not witness the war firsthand. Their narratives act as a counterforce to the suppression of traumatic memory, resisting the impulse to forget. These authors highlight the ambivalent nature of the war's participants by revisiting and reevaluating the past. The analysis is based on "Meeting" (2023), a collection of stories by four Georgian and four Abkhazian authors. In the book's preface, the project's creators emphasize that while war is rarely depicted directly in these stories, it is ever-present, looming as a destructive force that shaped the authors' world-views for years to come. Indeed, the collection's contributors share common themes, a unified conceptual approach to war and traumatic memory, and stylistic elements characteristic of feminine writing, such as nonlinear narratives, streams of consciousness, open endings, and autobiographical or subjective perspectives to convey personal experiences. However, the above do not homogenize their stylistic characteristics. On the contrary, the Georgian and Abkhaz female authors present issues of war trauma through distinct styles and perspectives, enriching the discourse with their diverse approaches.
Mariam Miresashvili (Tue,) studied this question.