Proposed synchronization control improves velocity estimation and stability in multi-agent systems, indicating a new approach to discrete-time communication.
The widespread application of multi-agent robotic systems in domains such as agricultural collaboration and automation has accentuated the challenges faced in seeking to achieve rapid synchronization and sustain high-performance control under conditions where velocity states remain unmeasurable. To relieve these challenges, a synchronization control framework is proposed for multi-agent systems, employing non-uniform sampling communication protocols. Initially, a state-variable transformation is applied to construct a composite Lyapunov function that integrates a sampling term. An explicit relation is then derived between the communication interval and the global exponential synchronization rate, thereby establishing a theoretical foundation for the design of non-periodic sampling-based control strategies. Second, a linear-state feedback controller is introduced, which balances convergence speed with the limited frequency of information updates, ensuring asymptotic stability even under prolonged sampling intervals. Third, a velocity observer was designed based on Immersion and Invariance (I&I) theory to solve the problem of unmeasurable velocity states, ensuring the exponential convergence of the estimation error. Finally, the simulation results demonstrate that, with sampling intervals of h∈[0.03,0.08] s, the position errors ∥qi−qd,i∥ of all six robots converge to below 10−2 within 7 s; meanwhile, the velocity estimation errors decay to nearly zero within 7 s, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed method. The main contributions of this work can be summarized as follows: (1) a new I&I velocity observer is tailored for discrete-time communication; (2) rigorous proof of global exponential convergence is provided via a composite Lyapunov energy function; (3) a reproducible MATLAB simulation framework is presented that enhances both the verifiability and applicability of the proposed approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: