Qualitative study examines governance perceptions amidst grassroots populism, suggesting implications for democracy.
This study explores the populist sentiments that emerged during the administration of former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, focusing on how these sentiments were articulated and sustained among the grassroots population. Drawing from qualitative-descriptive methodologies, including semi-structured interviews and participant observation, the research investigates the public’s perception of Duterte’s governance, particularly in the context of service delivery, foreign policy, and political controversies. The paper situates Duterte’s leadership within the broader global trend of right-wing populism, characterized by anti-elitist rhetoric, strongman governance, and a binary narrative of “the people” versus “the elite.” By analyzing interviews with selected supporters and conducting a thematic coding of their responses, the study reveals that Duterte’s popularity was rooted in his performance-oriented governance style, his direct communication with the masses, and his ability to channel public grievances into political support. The findings contribute to the understanding of the populist political style in Southeast Asia and offer insights into the enduring appeal of populist leaders even amid democratic backsliding. The study also raises implications for future electoral behavior and the resilience of democratic institutions in the Philippines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karl Lester R. De Vera (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: