⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

August 28, 2025Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi DergisiOpen Access

Performance of Generative AI Models on Cardiology Practice in Emergency Service: A Pilot Evaluation of GPT-4.o and Gemini-1.5-Flash

Şeyda Günay Deniz Sığırlı Vahide Aslıhan Durak Çetin Alak İrem İris Kan

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

GPT-4.o achieved a higher correct response rate of 65.7% compared to Gemini-1.5-Flash at 58.6%, highlighting a significant performance difference.
When analyzing question types, GPT-4.o fell short to Gemini-1.5-Flash in non-case questions, showcasing a nuanced performance profile.
The study utilized a set of 70 multiple choice questions to compare the diagnostic capabilities and readability of responses from both AI models.
Overall, both AI models performed better on easier questions and had varied success rates when images were included.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Implication

Pilot evaluation assesses GPT-4.o and Gemini-1.5-Flash for cardiac emergencies, revealing GPT-4.o's superiority in accuracy.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Günay et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1840e9b7b07f3a0610664 https://doi.org/10.32708/uutfd.1718121

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Performance of ChatGPT and Gemini Compared with Emergency Physicians in NSTEMI Cases: A Prospective Cross-sectional StudyCohort Study · 2025
2Comparative performance of ChatGPT, Gemini, and final-year emergency medicine clerkship students in answering multiple-choice questions: implications for the use of AI in medical education2025 · 14 citations
3Comparative performance of ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-5, and gemini 2.5 flash on Persian internal medicine subspecialty board exams2025 · 11 citations
4Benchmarking large language models on persian surgical subspecialty board examinations: a comparative study of ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-5, and Gemini 2.5 FlashOriginal Research · 2026
5Evaluation of ChatGPT and Gemini in Answering Patient Questions after Gynecologic SurgeryCross-Sectional Study · 2026 · 1 citations

Quality and Readability of AI-Generated Post-Myocardial Infarction Patient Information2026
Performance of large language models ChatGPT and Gemini in child and adolescent psychiatry knowledge assessment2025
Generative AI responses to exercise-related questions asked by patients with multiple sclerosis: An evaluation of quality, accuracy, and readability2026
Response to “Converging Evidence on the Strengths and Limits of Multimodal Large Language Models in Medicine: Comment on Günay-Polatkan et al.”Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi · 2026
Çok Modlu Büyük Dil Modellerinin Tıptaki Güçlü Yönleri ve Sınırlarına İlişkin Örtüşen Kanıtlar: Günay-Polatkan ve Arkadaşlarının Makalesine YorumUludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi · 2026

UMore from Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

More from Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇