Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study shows varying locomotor activity in Gammarus lacustris under different light conditions, indicating LED color temperature influences behavior.
Light pollution is becoming more widespread every year, accompanied by the active use of LED lighting. Currently, the ability of organisms to adapt to this pollution and the potential impact of LED lighting of different color temperatures and intensities on organisms remains poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to find out how long-term light pollution affects the behavior of amphipods Gammarus lacustris, and to compare their locomotor activity under different lighting conditions, taking into account the factor of shelter from light. The response of individuals was compared in group and individual experiments under daylight, without light, warm and cold LED light up to 30 lx. The individuals were from two populations: the first is not exposed to light pollution (lake No. 14), while the second is affected (the Angara River within the city of Irkutsk). The locomotor activity of amphipods was assessed in daylight, without light, warm and cold light of 2–2.5 lx and 10–11 lx in the presence and absence of shelters from light. As a result of the experiments, adaptive changes in the reaction of G. lacustris to warm light were identified in individuals from the Angara River. The importance of LED light color temperature and warm light intensity in determining amphipod response to light was also confirmed. It was found that warm and cold light have different effects on the behavior of G. lacustris, and the presence of shelters from light can reduce the negative impact of light pollution in natural conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ermolaeva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: