Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis shows transient mixed hearing loss in 75% of patients with inner ear schwannoma, highlighting its distinct audiometric features.
Objective To characterize the transition of audiometric features in patients with inner ear schwannoma (IES) with a special focus on transient mixed hearing loss. Patients Twelve patients were clinically diagnosed with an IES. Interventions All patients underwent otoscopic and audiological examinations, including serial pure-tone audiometry and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Additional audiometric measurements, including impedance audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, speech audiometry, and auditory brainstem responses were performed in selected patients. Main Outcome Measures All available audiograms were reviewed, and the configuration patterns, type of hearing loss, and air-bone gaps were analyzed. The relationship between audiometric features and radiologically identified tumor locations was examined. Results On the initial audiograms, 5 (41.7%) of the 12 patients showed U-shaped configurations, and 4 (33.3%) showed rising configurations. Serial audiograms demonstrated transient mixed hearing loss with air-bone gaps, predominantly in the low to mid frequencies in 9 (75.0%) patients, despite normal otoscopic findings. The incidence of mixed hearing loss (75.0%) was significantly higher than that of other inner ear disorders (4.1–12.8%). Progressive deterioration of hearing thresholds was observed in all patients, with severe-to-profound hearing loss in 11 (91.7%) patients. Conclusions In the early stage, the most common audiometric features in patients with IES are sensorineural hearing loss with a U-shaped or rising configuration with air-bone gaps at low to mid frequencies, followed by rapidly progressive hearing deterioration. Transient mixed hearing loss appears to be a distinct audiometric feature of patients with IES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KURATA et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: