Analysis explores how China navigates UN discourse on Ukraine, revealing trends of securitization and desecuritization.
When Russia launched its large-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, it justified the action by claiming that Ukraine’s political direction and alleged NATO encroachment posed a direct threat to Russia’s national security. China’s security discourse and diplomatic positioning in response have been heavily shaped by ideational factors, with deep-seated ideas, norms, and identities influencing its response to Russia’s security discourses. China’s discourse in the UN General Assembly demonstrates how it engages in both securitization and desecuritization simultaneously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aitzhanova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: