What type of study is this?

This is a Mixed-Methods Study study.

September 10, 2025Journal of Medical Education and Curricular DevelopmentOpen Access

Student Engagement in Program Evaluation: Redesigning the Premedical Curriculum Through Instructor–Learner Co-Creation

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The revised curriculum improved student alignment with preclinical learning, increasing agreement from 38.48% to 64.45%.
A 5-point Likert-scale questionnaire assessed 380 students' perceptions of curriculum relevance, revealing disconnected content issues.
Using the CIPP evaluation model, a two-phase mixed-methods approach ensured student involvement and collaborative revisions with the curriculum committee.
Statistical analyses showed significant improvements in perception scores, increasing from 18.03 ± 0.16 to 19.08 ± 0.35.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Mixed-methods study redesigned the premedical curriculum in collaboration with students, highlighting clinical relevance and early community exposure.

Cite This Study

Sertsuwankul et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c187209b7b07f3a0610ff5 https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251374898

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Mixed-methods study redesigned the premedical curriculum in collaboration with students, highlighting clinical relevance and early community exposure.

Student Engagement in Program Evaluation: Redesigning the Premedical Curriculum Through Instructor–Learner Co-Creation

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Student Engagement in Program Evaluation: Redesigning the Premedical Curriculum Through Instructor–Learner Co-Creation

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider