Computational analysis demonstrates varying effects of micro-vortex generator setups on turbulence in supersonic boundary layers, indicating significant implications for flow control.
The increasing demand for effective flow control in supersonic boundary layers, particularly for mitigating shock-wave boundary-layer interactions, underscores the need to explore optimized micro-vortex generator (MVG) configurations. This study investigates the aerodynamic performance of two different MVG configurations: a two-MVG setup with a pair of close parallel-positioned MVGs and a three-MVG arrangement that includes an additional upstream unit. Both are examined within a Mach 2.5 flow regime, aiming to improve mixing and energize the boundary layer. Large Eddy Simulations (LES) were performed using high-order numerical schemes. A newly developed vortex identification method was utilized to characterize vortex structures, while turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) metrics were integrated to quantify turbulence. Findings reveal that the two-MVG configuration produces regular, symmetric vortex pairs with limited interaction. This results in a steady increase in TKE and a thickened momentum boundary layer—indicative of notable energy loss. In contrast, the three-MVG setup generates more intricate and interactive vortex formations that significantly elevate TKE levels, rapidly expand the turbulent region, and reduce energy loss downstream. The peak TKE occurs before tapering slightly. Instantaneous flow analysis further highlights chaotic, hairpin-dominated vortex structures in the three-MVG case, compared to the more orderly ones observed in the two-MVG case. Overall, the three-MVG configuration demonstrates superior mixing and boundary-layer energization potential, albeit with greater structural complexity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: