This article proposes a theocentric model of pedagogy emphasizing dialogue in education, indicating a framework grounded in communication and discourse.
Based on the analysis of the works of Anthony (Bloom), the article attempts to build a model of theocentric pedagogy of dialogue. Dialogue is not only a tool, but also a self-sufficient goal of education and is closely related to the modern concept of discourse. This is a complex communicative phenomenon that includes, in addition to the text itself, various extralinguistic factors that are directly related to the pedagogy of the dialogue. She adds a number of pedagogical goals to the discourse, immerses in life not only the text of the speaking teacher, but also the students who ask and answer, in turn. Anthony (Bloom) paid special attention to dialogue as the fundamental idea of human interaction with each other, the relationship of man with God. Anthony (Bloom) writes that from early childhood we must establish a constant dialogue with the child. It is dialogue, not monologue, that is so important in our lives. Metropolitan Anthony emphasizes that if the child is only ears, and the parents are only a voice, then nothing will come of such education.The pedagogical model proposed on the basis of the works of Metropolitan Surozhsky consists of seven elements, each of which is connected with both the central idea and the space of dialogue, acting simultaneously as an element of the system. It is not man who is placed at the center of the pedagogical system, but God in his interaction with man, with the entire created world. The dia-logue permeates all the metropolitan's work and is used as the leading direction of the author's ped-agogical model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anatoly Schevjev (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: