Analysis reveals repurposing aluminum composite panels cuts costs and supports green building initiatives, suggesting benefits in sustainability.
The utilization of knowledge management (KM) assists construction companies in planning for waste management. This study applies KM in the material recovery of a public sector building renovation, focusing on aluminum composite panels (ACPs). The cost/benefit analysis (CBA) method examines suitable scenarios, where costs and benefits cover economic, environmental, and social perspectives. The cost/benefit (C/B) ratios reveal that the repurposing scenario, where ACP waste is repurposed as signboards, is the most suitable scenario, with a C/B of 0.96. The refurbishing scenario, in which ACP waste is refurbished as new facades, may be considered if the labor cost could be reduced through training. The repurposing scenario is further examined with a sensitivity analysis and the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certification, and it is found that implementing this scenario serves as a beginning step toward green certification and aligns with Thailand’s national strategies for green building promotion and the long-term Net Zero 2065 target. The study results serve as a guideline for Thailand’s transition toward a low-carbon and resource-efficient construction sector. Future studies are recommended to examine the complex relationships between costs and benefits and to track dynamic changes in the C/B ratio over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sereewatthanawut et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: