Assessment of bactericidal activity in chronic wounds using hypochlorous acid and other solutions, indicating product selection challenges.
Objectives: Chronic wounds are commonly manifested with biofilms that result in delayed healing and recurring infection episodes. Due to increasing antimicrobial resistance, antiseptics have played a significant role in wound infection management. To date, there is no standardised method to assess the ‘true’ antimicrobial efficacy of different antimicrobials, especially in testing condition that stipulate a high protein environment in the wound. As clinicians often rely on the antimicrobial efficacy profiles for product selection, a rigorous testing is warranted. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl)-based solutions have been introduced as a good alternative for wound cleansing but the assessment of its antimicrobial activities in a stipulate wound environment is limited. In this study, we assessed the in vitro bactericidal activities of 7 commercially available wound irrigation products commonly found in South-East Asia. Method: The evaluation was conducted using quantitative suspension method, EN 13727 in either low or high protein conditions. Results: Under low protein conditions, four out of the five HOCl products achieved bactericidal activity (≥ 5 log 10 reduction factor; RF) within 2 to 5 minutes, and only one product achieved 5 log RF at 15 seconds. None of the HOCl achieved 5 log RF under high protein, even after 30 minutes of exposure time. In contrast, protein interference on the antimicrobial activities of polyhexamethylene biguanide-based product is less pronounced (low protein: 60 seconds vs. high protein: 2 minutes to attain ≥ 5 log RF). Octenidine dihydrochloride is the only active not affected by protein interference achieving ≥ 5 log10 RF within 15 seconds in both low and high protein conditions. Conclusion: These findings warrant the need to screen antimicrobial wound care products, especially HOCl-based products, in high protein condition to better reflect the antimicrobial activities in wound care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yap et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: