Qualitative study highlights the role of equestrian coaches in promoting sustainability and equine welfare.
Background and Aims: The sustainability of equestrianism, as a sport and as a way of life, is currently in jeopardy. This is primarily due to the growing societal concerns regarding equine welfare in performance sport and the associated unethical human behavior. Expanding upon a growing body of research and action within the sector, this study looks to those who stand in the middle of the arena to shed light on the antecedents and consequences of poor horsemanship and to explore how the industry as a whole can work together to ensure a sustainable future. Materials and Methods: Sixteen British Horse Society Fellows and/or United Kingdom Coaching Certificate Level 4 coaches were recruited for this qualitative study. Participants took part in guided roundtable discussions, which were audio/video recorded, transcribed, and then analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Three high-order themes were identified. First, Individual Responsibilities in Equestrian Sport, with subthemes of human behavior change, advocating for the horse, and the coach as an ambassador for best practice. Second, Comprehensive Equestrian Coach Education, with subthemes of the role of mentorship, vicarious and continual learning, technical and coaching competencies, and formal coach education. Third, Collective Responsibilities in Equestrian Sport, with subthemes of horsemanship education, challenges and opportunities for sustainability, and cohesive practice for horse welfare. Conclusion: Coaches offer a vital source of counsel and are key influencers within the equestrian community and, therefore, should be considered instrumental in creating a sustainable future for equestrian sport from the inside out. To this end, equestrian coach education must ensure that, alongside technical and coaching competencies, the ability to demonstrate and teach the skills and values that provide psychological safety for humans involved in equestrianism is also taught and assessed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tufton et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: