Review highlights fish stock assessment methods in developing nations, emphasizing the Gordon–Schaefer model and management implications.
The paper discusses fish stock assessment methods, emphasising methods for assessing stocks in developing nations. We present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed. Approaches to fish stock assessment include single-species, multi-species, multi-gear and ecosystem approaches. We discuss the Gordon–Schaefer (GS) model, a single-species surplus production model, as an alternative method for assessing fishery stocks in developing nations, with Malawi as an example of a developing nation. Although the GS model is not a contemporary method, it is still suitable for the situation in Malawi. We review how the GS model has been applied globally, in general, and in Malawi, in particular. The review shows that most studies have concentrated on the calculation of maximum sustainable yield or maximum economic yield, leaving out open access yield and optimum sustainable yield which is the dynamic reference point. Using all reference points is crucial in making correct management decisions. Bifurcation analysis, calculation of annual sustainable production, and calculation of depletion are missing in most studies. Future research should focus on integrating the use of all four reference points, bifurcation analysis, and calculation of depletion as well as annual sustainable production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chamera et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: