Observational analysis demonstrates improved cognitive function in stroke patients using brain—computer interfaces and biofeedback compared to standard therapy.
Objective. Comparison of the effectiveness of two “brain—computer” interface (BCI) software complexes using biofeedback (BF) and standard therapy in restoring cognitive functions after a stroke. Material and methods. Eighty-nine stroke patients were examined. Neuropsychological testing was carried out using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), the Tracking test, the Wechsler subtest 9 Kohs block design test, the Schulte tables, the Memorization of 10 Words test (according to A.R. Luria). Using the simple randomization method, three groups were formed: the main group (n=37), the comparison group (n=33) and the control group (n=19). In Group 1, sessions were conducted with BCI+BF based on the rhythm P300; in Group 2, with BCI+BF based on the mu-rhythm of electroencephalography (EEG), Group 3 received standard therapy. Results. An increase in the total MoCA score was reported in all three groups. The results in Groups 1 and 2 were comparable, exceeding those in Group 3 (p1—2=0.199, p1—3<0.001, p2—3=0.037). The effectiveness in Group 1 did not depend on the baseline MoCA score, exceeding the indicators in Group 3; in Group 2, the advantage over Group 3 was with a baseline MoCA of at least 22. According to the Schulte tables and the Tracking test, comparable statistically significant changes were obtained in Groups 1 and 2; no statistically significant change was reported in the control group. The Kohs block design test showed a more statistically significant change in the main group. The Memorization of 10 Words test by A.R. Luria also showed a more consistent improvement in mnestic disorders in the main group. Conclusion. The effectiveness of BCI+BF exceeded standard therapy for post-stroke cognitive impairment. The advantage of IMC+BFB used in the main group over IMC+BFB in the comparison group was noted, which was due to a decrease in the effectiveness of the latter with a baseline MoCA score of less than 22 points, lower performance in the Memorizing 10 Words test and the Kohs block design test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Исакова et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: