Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical justification for 'discursive-textual space' highlights its role in political linguistics and discourse analysis.
The article substantiates the necessity of actualising the term “discursive-textual space” in the metalanguage of political linguistics and political linguistic personology. Additionally, it examines the correlation between the concepts of “text”, “discourse”, and “discursive-textual space”, as well as outlines contemporary approaches to the study of discourse and text. The relevance of employing the term “discursive-textual space” in the methodological analysis of political anthroponyms is characterised by focusing on those that constitute the “discursive-textual journalistic-political space” of the works of D. Dontsov’s linguistic person. It is illustrated aspectually through an analysis of the discursive-textual interpretation of the existential semantic-pragmatic meaning of political anthroponyms used in the defined space in various functions, particularly in strong and weak textual positions, as individually authored symbols, figurative devices, and representatives of intertextuality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosmeda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: