PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Science Translational Medicine42 citationsOpen Access

Comprehensive analysis of microbial content in whole-genome sequencing samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas project

View Full Paper
YGYuchen GeJLJennifer LuDPDaniela Puiu

Key Points

  • The analysis showed that the reported presence of microbes in cancer samples is significantly overestimated, revealing major discrepancies.
  • Using updated computational methods, the study examined 5734 whole-genome sequencing datasets from TCGA, highlighting the accuracy of microbial detection.
  • Previous studies overstated microbial species, challenging assumptions in cancer research about the role of bacteria, fungi, and viruses.
  • The released dataset provides essential reference data for future investigations, helping to avoid misleading findings in the field.

Abstract

In recent years, a growing number of publications have reported the presence of microbial species in human tumors and mixtures of microbes that appear to be highly specific to different cancer types. Our recent reanalysis of data from three cancer types revealed that technical errors have caused erroneous reports of numerous microbial species found in sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project. Here, we have expanded our analysis to cover all 5734 whole-genome sequencing (WGS) datasets currently available from TCGA, covering 25 distinct types of cancer. We analyzed the microbial content using updated computational methods and databases and compared our results to those from two major recent studies that focused on bacteria, viruses, and fungi in cancer. Our results expand upon and reinforce our recent findings, which show that the presence of microbes is far smaller than had been previously reported and that many species identified in TCGA data might not be present at all. As part of this expanded analysis and to help others avoid being misled by flawed data, we have released a dataset that contains detailed read counts for bacteria, viruses, archaea, and fungi detected in all 5734 TCGA samples, which can serve as a public reference for future investigations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ge et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c188509b7b07f3a0612342https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.ads6335
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper