Investigation reveals enhanced structural stability of SnO2 nanoparticles under acoustic shock, highlighting differences with TiO2 nanoparticles.
Nanoscale materials have wide applications in extreme conditions, including those related to aerospace- and defense-based technological aspects. However, for these kinds of applications, the sustainability of the crystal structure and related properties is highly required. In the present work, we investigate the rutile-type hexagonal-shaped SnO2 NPs' crystallographic, optical, and magnetic structural stabilities under acoustic shock wave-loaded conditions, and the observed structural stability results are compared with similar hexagonal-shaped rutile-type TiO2 NPs under shocked conditions. From the observed X-ray diffraction results of the SnO2 NPs, the rutile space group P42/mnm remains constant at 200 shock conditions without any structural deformations and distortions. The band gap energy is slightly increased due to the formation of surface defects, and the obtained values of band gap energy are found to be 3.55, 3.61, and 3.72 eV for the 0, 100, and 200 shocked conditions, respectively. According to the magnetic property results, the weak ferromagnetic state remains unaltered, and the thermal stability of the SnO2 NPs is also unchanged, which demonstrates the absence of structural phase transitions under shocked conditions. However, the similar analogue-structured material of rutile-TiO2 NPs transformed to the anatase phase after exposure to 90 shocks. Based on the observed overall structure–property stabilities and relationships of the SnO2 and TiO2 NPs, SnO2 NPs have a high degree of structural stability under dynamic shocked conditions because of their higher thermal conductivity, and the observed results are discussed based on the shock wave-induced superheating approach. Due to their impressive stability profiles, SnO2 NPs are highly deserving candidates for applications in extreme conditions, which include aerospace, defense, laser operation, and gas sensing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aswathappa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: