Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial finds similar efficacy for luspatercept plus roxadustat in MDS-RS patients, suggesting comparable safety profiles.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of luspatercept combined with roxadustat in patients with refractory low-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) patients. Methods: In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients with refractory MDS-RS were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive either combination therapy (luspatercept + roxadustat) or luspatercept monotherapy. The primary endpoint was erythroid response at 12 weeks, while secondary endpoints included erythroid response at 24 weeks, achievement of transfusion independence ≥8 weeks within the first 12 weeks, and other hematologic indicators. Results: The combination therapy and monotherapy groups included 16 and 32 patients, respectively. Baseline demographic characteristics, laboratory tests, IPSS-R risk classification, transfusion burden, EPO levels, and previous treatment history were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). With similar doses of luspatercept and follow-up durations, no significant differences were observed between the groups at either 12 or 24 weeks in terms of erythroid response, transfusion independence, or other clinical indicators (all P-values>0.05). The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups (all P-values>0.05) . Conclusion: Luspatercept combined with roxadustat shows comparable efficacy and safety to luspatercept monotherapy in the treatment of refractory low-risk MDS-RS. Clinical trial register: Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing (K3697).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: