In vitro analysis shows improved enamel microhardness with nanohydroxyapatite and treatments, suggesting effective alternatives for dental care.
Remineralizing early enamel lesions in primary dentition remain a significant challenge in dentistry, requiring innovative approaches to enhance enamel repair. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a commercially available nanohydroxyapatite paste (Nano P), alone and in combination with air dielectric barrier discharge cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) and a 940-nm diode laser, on enamel remineralization. In this in vitro study, 105 intact anterior primary teeth were randomly assigned into one control and six experimental groups: (I) control, (II) Fluoride varnish, (III) Nano P, (IV) Nano P + dye + laser, (V) Nano P + laser, (VI) CAP, and (VII) Nano P + CAP. Caries-like lesions were induced by demineralization. Microhardness was evaluated before and after demineralization and 4 weeks post-remineralization with pH cycling. Data analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA (α=.05) and Tamhane's Post-Hoc test, with effect sizes determined by Cohen's d test and Hedges' g correction. The percentage of recovery of the enamel microhardness was calculated. Initial and secondary microhardness were similar across groups (p Value >.05). Post-remineralization, significant differences were observed (p< 0.05), with the highest microhardness in the Nano P+ laser group, followed by Nano P+ dye+ laser, Nano P+ CAP, Nano P, fluoride varnish, CAP, and the control. Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between all pairs except Nano P+ laser and Nano P+ dye + laser (p= 0.7, Effect size=0.4). Nano P combined with a laser, followed by Nano P with plasma, and Nano P alone significantly increased microhardness more than fluoride or plasma, suggesting these combinations as effective alternatives for enamel remineralization in primary teeth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakhtiary et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: