Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis reveals the impact of genomic context on antisense oligonucleotides effectiveness in splicing assays, suggesting improved therapeutic strategies.
Mini/midigene splicing assays are often used to evaluate splicing modulation therapy, for example, employing antisense oligonucleotides (AONs). Twenty-five AONs targeting the splicing defect caused by a recurrent variant in ABCA4 (c.768G>T) were tested using a midigene containing a part of intron 5, exon 6, and a part of intron 6 of the ABCA4 gene. Surprisingly, almost all AONs showed high efficacy, complicating candidate selection. We hypothesized that the lack of genomic context may lead to a very accessible transcript for AONs. Indeed, the use of an ABCA4 maxigene that contains a part of intron 5, exon 6, parts of intron 6, and the genomic region between exons 7 and 11 allowed a clear distinction between efficacious and less efficacious AONs, corroborating the results we recently observed in patient-derived retinal cells. These underscore the necessity of a proper genetic context included in constructs used in splicing assays to assess the potential of splicing modulation therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karjosukarso et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: