Before-after study evaluates order-set intervention to enhance guideline concordance for CABP in outpatient clinics and urgent care, suggesting better therapy selection.
This before-after study aimed to evaluate whether an order-set intervention would improve CABP-guideline concordance among outpatients. This study included adult patients presenting to outpatient clinics (n = 92) and urgent care centers (n = 39) within a community-based health system without a formal outpatient antibiotic stewardship program (ASP). The intervention consisted of an antibiotic order-set and awareness campaign. Patient encounters were identified via CABP ICD-10 codes and IDSA-relevant patient comorbidities (chronic heart, lung, liver, or renal disease; diabetes mellitus; alcoholism; malignancy; asplenia) were extracted from the electronic health record. Primary outcome was to describe the proportion of patients receiving concordant therapy per IDSA guideline and local antibiogram in a pre- (May 2023 - April 2024) and post-intervention period (May 2024 - December 2024). Baseline and intervention antibiotic concordance rate was 33.3% (1,467/4,401 encounters) and 28.0% (1,388/4,954 encounters), respectively. Among patients with no comorbidity, monotherapy prescriptions (concordant and discordant) decreased post-intervention and were replaced by higher levels of combination therapy (15% increase), albeit all discordant due to lack of comorbidities. Among patients with comorbidities, combination antibiotics increased by 12% post-intervention, driven by concordant prescriptions including amoxicillin/clavulanate plus azithromycin while the most frequently prescribed discordant combination was amoxicillin plus azithromycin. Trends were similar in primary care and urgent care centers. A stewardship intervention, including an order-set and awareness campaign improved the selection of combination therapy for appropriate patients but did not improve overall guideline concordance. For health systems without a dedicated outpatient ASP, these data will help bolster stewardship efforts towards more effective strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asempa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: