Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“CPET is very informative in the population with CHD and should be an important component of longitudinal surveillance to guide treatment, intervention, rehabilitation, and exercise prescription.”
Review explores cardiopulmonary exercise testing applications across congenital heart disease types, suggesting its role in risk assessment and tailored care.
Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is increasingly recognized as a key tool for evaluating patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). While traditional assessments focus on resting parameters, CPET provides dynamic, integrated insight into cardiovascular, respiratory, and muscular function during exertion. Objectives: This review explores the clinical value of CPET across the spectrum of CHD, with dedicated focus on its applications in both adult and paediatric populations. We analyse the prognostic significance of key CPET parameters—particularly peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2), ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope), and heart rate dynamics—within distinct anatomical and physiological categories of CHD. Findings: CPET reliably detects exercise intolerance, guides intervention timing, informs exercise prescription, and stratifies risk. Peak VO2 and heart rate reserve are consistently associated with adverse outcomes across most CHD types. However, the prognostic utility of other variables, such as the VE/VCO2 slope, varies with pathophysiology—being less reliable in cyanotic lesions like Eisenmenger syndrome. In paediatric patients, CPET must be adapted to growth-related physiological variability and is increasingly used to assess quality of life, functional limitation, and response to therapy. Conclusions: CPET is a powerful, non-invasive tool that should be integrated into routine management of CHD patients across all ages. It enhances risk assessment, supports tailored care, and promotes safe physical activity, ultimately contributing to improved long-term outcomes and quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guglielmi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: