Electrochemical sensing reveals structural influences on heavy-metal ion detection in coordination polymers using Schiff base ligands.
Retaining the topology of the framework and the metal nodes while judiciously modifying the organic linker constituents presents an opportune avenue to systematically investigate the structure–activity relationship of coordination polymers (CPs). Herein, two functionalized Schiff base ligands, H6L1a (1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N′-bis(3-tert-butyl-5-m-dicarboxybenzo-o-hydroxybenzyl)) and H6L2a (1,2-diphenylethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(3-tert-butyl-5-m-diacarboxybenzo-o-hydroxybenzyl)), were designed and prepared. In the two ligands, the amine moiety connecting the Schiff base is either 1,2-diaminocyclohexane or the more sterically hindered diphenylethylenediamine, which directly influences the pore distribution in the subsequently synthesized crystalline materials. Their corresponding homologous Schiff base CPs [Cu3(L1b)2H2O]·7DMF·16H2O (1) (1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N-(3-tert-butyl-5-m-dicarboxybenzo-o-hydroxybenzyl)) and [Cu3(L2b)2H2O]·6DMF·12H2O (2) (1,2-diphenylethylenediamine-N-(3-tert-butyl-5-m-diacarboxybenzo-o-hydroxybenzyl)) were synthesized successfully by in situ ligand transformation reactions. Two compounds have similar structures and the same active Cu centers, providing a good model to investigate the structure–activity relationship of crystalline materials. Experiments showed that both compounds exhibit excellent electrocatalytic sensing performance toward heavy-metal ions. The result analysis illustrated that the superior performance of compound 1 is attributed to its unique cavity structure, while these channels are occupied by the phenyl moieties of the ligands in compound 2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: