Theoretical and experimental analysis demonstrates 10x fusion gain in field reversed configuration, suggesting viability for compact fusion reactors.
A new methodology for achieving the formation and compressional heating of a Field Reversed Configuration (FRC) plasmoid has been investigated both theoretically and experimentally at the University of Washington and MSNW. This approach, based on previous FRC empirical scaling, is expected to achieve fusion gain as large as 10. For the FRC, the fusion gain, G ~ φ p ·Be 2 where φ p is the FRC poloidal flux and B e the confining axial magnetic field. G is essentially independent of the FRC radial scale making feasible a small, compact reactor. The necessary φ p (> 60mWb) is achieved by employing a large formation chamber (~ 0.8m radius) combined with the requisite axial magnetic field reversal time (E θ ~ 20kV/m) for generating a high initial temperature (T i > 1keV) FRC. By employing the dynamic formation procedure, the FRC is accelerated to ~100-150km/s. This subsonic velocity is maintained as the FRC is translated through a series of cylindrical coils of decreasing radius but of sufficient length (> L FRC ) and number (~ 10) to produce essentially an isentropic and adiabatic radial wall-compression of the equilibrium FRC. The final stage is a 12cm diameter, 3-6m long confinement and burn chamber with a vacuum field of 7-9T produced by external solenoidal coils inside the flux conserving cylinder. The vacuum field is compressed by the FRC on insertion to 35 T resulting in fusion gain conditions for the 2-5 ms transit. The large ratio of FRC to inner wall radius (0.85) substantially lowers the FRC edge pressure thereby greatly reducing both particle and thermal losses. The resulting D-T fusion yield for the 3.5MJ FRC is 20-40MJ/pulse. The final ejection and expansion of the FRC into a large, low field mirror chamber provides a mechanism for FRC energy recovery. The experimental justification and the physics basis for the entire process from formation through burn of the Compact FRC Fusion Reactor (CFR2) concept is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Slough (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: