This analysis reveals how generative AI affects political participation and efficacy, indicating necessary digital engagement strategies.
This study examine the roles of internal and collective political efficacy across different forms of political participation, with a focus on how generative AI, used as a digital engagement tool by governments, influences citizens' political interest, knowledge, efficacy, and participation. The findings reveal that internal political efficacy significantly promotes political participation, especially non-institutionalized participation, while collective political efficacy plays a more limited role. The government's use of generative AI improves access to policy information and political participation opportunities. However, its impact on political efficacy depends on whether online engagement leads to real policy responsiveness. Policy responsiveness plays a key role in enhancing efficacy and sustained participation. This study shows that political efficacy is influenced by both individual cognition and external factors, highlighting the need for digital government strategies to combine innovation with effective policy feedback to better engage citizens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: