Research-practice partnerships improve interventions for families of children with disabilities, highlighting collaboration with Parent Training and Information Centers.
Abstract Research-practice partnerships (RPPs) reflect mutual relationships and collaborative approaches to address problems of practice. RPPs can help ensure that interventions are sustained in the real world. Yet, little research has explored how to partner with educational agencies, including Parent Training and Information Centers (PTIs; federally-funded agencies to educate and empower families of children with disabilities about their special education rights). By understanding RPPs among researchers and PTIs, interventions may be more responsive to families of children disabilities and likely to be sustained in the community. In this study, we partnered with six PTIs to conduct a civic engagement program (CEP). The partnership included preparatory meetings and two six-hr CEPs for families of children with disabilities with each PTI. Data included meeting transcripts and a social validity interview with multiple staff members from each PTI. To facilitate a strong partnership with the PTI, the researchers acknowledged and leveraged the expertise and experience of the PTIs. Barriers to the partnerships included challenges with aspects of the research process. When considering partnering with PTIs, researchers may consider ways to ensure the research is family-friendly. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos‐Torres et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: