Simulation analysis reveals MLE and MAP methods estimate claim-time behaviour accurately in insurance portfolios, suggesting MCMC's robustness across distributions.
The study investigated the dynamics of _commencement-to-event-time-behaviour in life insurance portfolios, employing Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) with the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation technique. Focusing on the Lognormal and Exponential distributions for their efficacy in modelling time-to-occurrence data, the research simulated 120 observations from both distributions and estimated parameters using the first 80 ordered samples. Remarkably, estimates for lognormal parameters obtained through MLE and MAP_MCMC were highly similar, with errors well within 10% of the actual values, highlighting the accuracy of both methods. The study also explored the robustness of the MAP_MCMC technique to various prior distributions, demonstrating its effectiveness across different priors, including Exponential, Normal, Gamma, Pareto, and Weibull prior distributions. In the case of the exponential distribution, both MLE and MAP_MCMC techniques performed exceptionally well, providing estimates within 5% of the true value, with MAP _MCMC exhibiting remarkable precision, just 1% off the true value. Real-life data fitted to the Gamma distribution showed that MLE and MAP _MCMC methods, using censored data, closely approximated benchmark estimates from the method of moments. The MAP_MCMC approach slightly outperformed the MLE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hesse et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: