Observational analysis reveals significant differences in plantar pressure distribution by foot type, indicating distinct static and dynamic behaviors.
Background: Plantar pressure distribution is a valuable tool for studying how the ground reaction forces are transmitted from the feet to the body and for detecting abnormalities in foot biomechanics. Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the foot type (normal foot, flatfoot, and cavus foot) on plantar pressure distribution in healthy Mexican men and women aged from 3 to 74 years. Methods: A database of the plantar pressure distribution under dynamic and static conditions for both feet was studied using descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and statistical factorial design. The database contained images of the soles of the feet and pressure distribution of 996 persons between 3 and 74 years old (53.9% females and 46.1% males). Two different conditions were evaluated; the first was in a static condition, and the second was during walking. The Chippaux–Smirak Index (CSI) was used to classify the type of feet. Results: In the left foot, a linear regression analysis of the soles of the feet shows that the prevalence of flatfoot (p-value = 3.45 × E−5) decreased with age, while the normal foot (p-value = 7.39 × E−5) increased. When people are standing (static), the hindfoot (55.64 ± 18.80%) presents more pressure than the forefoot (45.18 ± 19.50%), while in dynamic, the forefoot (55.95 ± 13.36%) supports more pressure than the hindfoot (44.05 ± 13.36%). Similar behavior occurs in the right foot. A statistical factorial design ANOVA shows that the plantar pressure in the forefoot and hindfoot regions is significantly different (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The prevalence of flatfoot decreased with age, while the proportion of normal foot type increased. Under static conditions, the hindfoot bore more load than the forefoot, whereas under dynamic conditions, the forefoot bore more load than the hindfoot. This research contributes to generating a comprehensive database of reference values of the plantar pressure of different foot types in a Mexican population; this will be useful to podiatrists, clinicians, and physiotherapists for the analysis or treatment of abnormal foot postures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos-Frutos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: