Review discusses the rising incidence and clinical features of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, highlighting survival outcomes and associations with hereditary syndromes.
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are a specific subgroup of pancreatic tumours due to their distinct biological and histological behavior, with a consequently unique clinical approach. Although rare, they constitute 1-5% of all pancreatic tumours, being second in frequency after ductal adenocarcinoma. With growing incidence since the first data was published in 1970, more recent studies estimate 1000 new cases yearly in the United States. Although 80 to 90% of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (panNETs) are sporadic, their association with hereditary syndromes such as Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1, Von Hippel-Lindau Syndrome, Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Tuberous Sclerosis, is well documented. According to the World Health Organization, they can be classified as functioning or non-functioning regarding their association with clinical syndromes due to hormone secretion. Non-functioning tumours, which are about 90% of panNETs, are generally asymptomatic, but may present with abdominal pain and biliary or gastric obstruction, secondary to tumour mass compression. Clinical manifestations of functioning neoplasms are associated with the hormone they secrete. in older studies, survival rates of well-differentiated panNETs were around 33% at 5 years, 17% at 10 years and 10% at 20 years. Most recent data indicate a 5-year overall survival rate of 83% for localized tumours. Among the functioning tumours, insulinoma is typically the least aggressive, unlike gastrin, glucagon or somatostatin-producing tumours, which generally have a worse prognosis. In this review, we will highlight the recent epidemiological data of panNETs and summarize the clinical presentation of sporadic tumours, including the most frequent functioning panNETs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonçalves et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: