This systematic review explores machine learning techniques for aviation safety, highlighting their effectiveness and implications.
The aviation industry prioritizes safety and has embraced innovative approaches for both reactive and proactive safety measures. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a useful tool for aviation safety. This systematic literature review explores ML applications for safety within the aviation industry over the past 25 years. Through a comprehensive search on Scopus and backward reference searches via Google Scholar, 87 of the most relevant papers were identified. The investigation focused on the application context, ML techniques employed, data sources, and the implications of contextual nuances for safety analysis outcomes. ML techniques have been effective for post-accident analysis, predictive, and real-time incident detection across diverse aviation scenarios. Supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised learning methods, including neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, and deep learning models, have all been applied for analyzing accidents, identifying patterns, and forecasting potential incidents. Notably, data sources such as the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) datasets were the most used. Transparency, fairness, and bias mitigation emerge as critical factors that shape the credibility and acceptance of ML-based safety research in aviation. The review revealed seven recommended future research directions: (1) interpretable AI; (2) real-time prediction; (3) hybrid models; (4) handling of unbalanced datasets; (5) privacy and data security; (6) human–machine interface for safety professionals; (7) regulatory implications. These directions provide a blueprint for further ML-based aviation safety research. This review underscores the role of ML applications in shaping aviation safety practices, thereby enhancing safety for all stakeholders. It serves as a constructive and cautionary guide for researchers, practitioners, and decision-makers, emphasizing the value of ML when used appropriately to transform aviation safety to be more data-driven and proactive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nanyonga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: