Analysis reveals grid-connected and off-grid systems can reduce CO2 emissions, suggesting effective energy strategies for greenhouses.
This study evaluates the technical, economic, and environmental feasibility of grid-connected and off-grid hybrid energy systems designed to meet the energy demands of a greenhouse facility. Various system configurations were developed based on combinations of solar, wind, diesel, and battery storage technologies. The analysis considers a daily electricity consumption of 369.52 kWh and a peak load of 52.59 kW for the greenhouse complex. Among the grid-connected systems, the grid/PV configuration was identified as the most optimal, offering the lowest Net Present Cost (NPC) of USD 282,492, the lowest Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) at USD 0.0401/kWh, and a reasonable emissions reduction of 54.94%. For off-grid scenarios, the generator/PV/battery configuration was the most cost-effective option, with a total cost of USD 1.19 million and an LCOE of USD 0.342/kWh. Environmentally, this system showed a strong performance, achieving a 64.58% reduction in CO2 emissions; in contrast, fully renewable systems such as PV/wind/battery and wind/battery configurations succeeded in reaching zero-emission targets but were economically unfeasible due to their very high investment costs and limited practical applicability. Sensitivity analyses revealed that economic factors such as inflation and energy prices have a critical effect on the payback time and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuri Çağlayan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: