What type of study is this?

September 10, 2025European Journal of Social PsychologyOpen Access

A Dialogue With the (il)Legitimate Other: An Action‐Oriented and Dialogical Account of Social Representations in Urban‐Integration Policy

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

TMThomas MadsenUniversity of Copenhagen TMThomas A. MortonUniversity College Dublin SPSéamus A. PowerUniversity of Copenhagen

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Qualitative analysis uncovers perspectives on the Danish integration policy, suggesting conflict between social representations and institutional practices.

Key Points

Professionals expressed varying perspectives on the Danish integration policy, indicating differing social representations.
The analysis revealed two dimensions—freedom-equality and private-public—around which conflicting views were articulated.
Semi-structured interviews highlighted implicit reactions to politicians, suggesting a shaping of policy representation.
Engaging with diverse policy meanings, professionals contributed to the ongoing dialogue surrounding urban integration.

Cite This Study

Madsen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c189d99b7b07f3a0613692 https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70019

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Qualitative analysis uncovers perspectives on the Danish integration policy, suggesting conflict between social representations and institutional practices.

A Dialogue With the (il)Legitimate Other: An Action‐Oriented and Dialogical Account of Social Representations in Urban‐Integration Policy

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

A Dialogue With the (il)Legitimate Other: An Action‐Oriented and Dialogical Account of Social Representations in Urban‐Integration Policy

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider