Observational analysis shows significant knowledge gain in medical toxicology for students via remote augmented reality training, highlighting innovative educational methods.
Formal medical toxicology training is limited in many resource-constrained regions, including India, where poisonings and envenomations are highly prevalent. There is an urgent need for accessible toxicology education for healthcare providers in these settings. This study evaluates a novel augmented reality-based observed simulation model to remotely teach medical toxicology concepts to physicians-in-training in India. A toxicology topic relevant to India was selected, and key learning objectives defined. An augmented reality-based module was developed involving a clinical-case simulation with overlaid visuals. The trainer in the United States, streamed the session via an augmented reality headset to learners in India using a virtual communication platform. A user experience survey and pre-/post-tests were conducted immediately before and after the educational session, with knowledge gain analyzed using a paired t-test (P <0.05). One hundred and twenty-four participants attended, comprising third- and fourth-year medical students and interns. The mean post-test score improved significantly from 11.10 (±2.81) to 16.80 (±2.37; maximum score: 20), with a mean increase of 5.70 (±2.91, P <0.001). Qualitative feedback supported augmented reality and simulation as effective remote teaching tools. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using an augmented reality and simulation-based remote model to teach medical toxicology. A statistically significant improvement in test scores indicated short-term knowledge gain. Important limitations included the absence of delayed post-testing to assess retention, lack of a comparator group taught using traditional instructional methods, and no use of validated tools to measure immersion and motivation. Augmented reality and simulation-based remote teaching models can serve as effective, immersive, and interactive tools where in-person training is constrained. They offer a much-needed opportunity to link institutions with established medical toxicology programs to physicians in countries lacking formal training, helping bridge critical global education gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ralph et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: