This study demonstrates that PFAS exposure alters gene expression in mallard ducklings, suggesting immune modulation risks.
This study investigated the effects of two emerging PFAS compounds, perfluorododecane sulfonic acid (PFDoDS) and perfluoro-4-ethylcyclohexane sulfonic acid (PFECHS), alongside legacy perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), on gene expression in the liver, heart, and bursa of Fabricius from mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos) exposed in ovo, simulating maternal transfer to the egg. These PFAS compounds were selected based on their detection in a declining sea duck species and concerns over their endocrine disruption potential. Farmed mallard eggs were injected with 80 ng/g of PFDoDS, PFECHS, or PFOS, reflecting concentrations at the upper end of those reported in wild bird eggs. In the liver, mRNA and small RNA sequencing revealed sex-specific changes in genes related to metabolism and immune function, particularly antiviral responses, in PFECHS- and PFDoDS-exposed ducklings. Notably, there was overlap between male PFECHS- and PFOS-exposed groups. In the heart, targeted qPCR analysis of mRNA and microRNA associated with stress, inflammation, and development showed no differences, though trends included altered expression of genes involved in oxidative and cellular stress responses across treatments. In the bursa of Fabricius, targeted qPCR of immune-related mRNA revealed upward trends in innate immune gene expression across all exposure groups, also consistent with antiviral immune activation, suggesting shared transcriptional effects among these sulfonated PFAS. These findings demonstrate that emerging PFAS exposure alters gene regulation related to key physiological pathways, with responses differing by sex and tissue type. Our results underscore the complexity of PFAS-induced immune modulation and highlight potential developmental risks of maternal PFAS transfer in wild avian species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brand et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: