Retrospective study measures orbital volume and enophthalmos in patients using resorbable implants, indicating variable outcomes.
Resorbable implants are increasingly used in orbital wall fracture reconstruction because of their ability to provide temporary structural support without the long-term complications associated with permanent materials. However, the long-term effects of implant resorption on orbital morphology are unclear. This retrospective study evaluated volumetric changes over time following reconstruction using 2 types of resorbable plates: uncalcined hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactic acid (u-HA/PLLA) and poly-L-lactic acid/polyglycolic acid (PLLA/PGA). Thirty patients with fresh orbital wall fractures were analysed using computed tomography (CT)-based orbital volume measurements at 3 time points: preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative (≥4 mo). Orbital volumes were calculated with Mimics software, and ocular protrusion was assessed to estimate enophthalmos. In the u-HA/PLLA group, the mean orbital volume difference decreased from 2.30±1.29 cm 3 preoperatively to 1.10±0.58 cm 3 immediately after surgery and remained stable at 1.17±0.63 cm 3 during follow-up ( P =0.2784 versus early). In contrast, the PLLA/PGA group initially showed improvement, which was followed by significant regression during follow-up periods. A significant correlation was observed between orbital volume differences and enophthalmos ( P =0.004, R 2 =0.260). These findings indicate that PLLA/PGA implants may lead to morphologic regression, whereas u-HA/PLLA provides more stable outcomes. Implant selection should therefore consider long-term mechanical strength to ensure sustained structural integrity and optimal clinical results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasegawa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: