Retrospective cohort study compares PLLA/PGA to Synpor implants for orbital fractures, highlighting implications for reconstruction choices.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of poly-L-lactic acid/polyglycolic acid (PLLA/PGA, 85:15) implants compared with nonresorbable Synpor implants for 3D model-assisted reconstruction of large orbital blowout fractures. This retrospective single-center cohort study included 50 patients with unilateral orbital blowout fractures, categorized into four groups according to implant material and defect area (DA): A1 (Synpor, DA < 2 cm 2 ), A2 (Synpor, DA 2–3 cm 2 ), B1 (PLLA/PGA, DA < 2 cm 2 ), and B2 (PLLA/PGA, DA 2–3 cm 2 ). The postoperative follow-up duration ranged from 6.0 to 45.1 months, with a median follow-up of 6.9 months. Orbital volume ratio (OVR), enophthalmos, diplopia, and sensory disturbance were assessed preoperatively and at 1 week and 6 months postoperatively. Complications were recorded. At 6 months, the mean OVR difference was − 0.034% (95% CI, -1.535 to 1.467; adjusted P = 1.000) for A1 vs. B1 and 0.605% (95% CI, -0.927 to 2.137; adjusted P = 0.930) for A2 vs. B2, suggesting that no statistically significant material-related difference was detected. Enophthalmos resolved at 1 week and showed mild recurrence at 6 months in groups A2 and B2. Diplopia decreased in groups A1 and B1 and increased slightly in groups A2 and B2 at 1 week but almost disappeared at 6 months. No difference in sensory disturbance was observed between the groups. Only one case of delayed hematoma was observed in group A2. PLLA/PGA (85:15) resorbable implants may provide stable reconstruction of large orbital blowout fractures and may be an effective alternative to nonresorbable implants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: