PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Endocrines13 citationsOpen Access

Novel Anthropometric Indices: An Allometric Perspective

View Full Paper
NKNir Y. KrakauerJKJesse C. Krakauer

Key Points

  • ABSI and HI offer independent metrics for assessing mortality risk, unlike most other indices.
  • Indexed data from the NHANES III cohort revealed large correlations between common indices and BMI.
  • Proposed anthropometric indices often rely on geometric similarity, misrepresenting human body variability.
  • Combining mortality risk estimates from ABSI and BMI provides more effective risk evaluations.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Anthropometric indices based on height (H), weight (W), waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC) can identify incident and future health risks. While BMI provides a standard for relative W (adjusted for H), there is no standard for indices using WC and HC. A body shape index (ABSI) and hip index (HI) have been proposed to extend to respectively WC and HC the same allometric power-law approach used to derive BMI to be independent of H. Here, we compared the mutually independent allometric set H, BMI, ABSI, HI with other proposed indices. Methods: We examined the formulas and rationales of published indices, and used Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) cohort data to investigate their inter-correlations and association with mortality. Results: Many of the proposed indices are based on geometric (isometric) similarity, which does not match human body variability patterns. Unlike ABSI and HI, most proposed indices showed large correlations with BMI, complicating interpretation when considered together with BMI. Indices’ association with mortality risk were generally consistent with their correlations with BMI and ABSI. Combining the separable mortality risks associated with BMI and ABSI, even in a simplified way, outperformed any single index. Conclusions: With calls for incorporating additional indices incorporating WC and HC to supplement BMI in defining obesity, only ABSI and HI are independent of BMI. Additionally, separate risk estimates from these allometric indices can be readily combined to optimize overall risk assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krakauer et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c189e79b7b07f3a0613f91https://doi.org/10.3390/endocrines6030044
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Survival of the fattest: unexpected findings about hyperglycaemia and obesity in a population based study of 75-year-olds2011 · 22 citations
  2. 2The predictive ability of ABSI compared to BMI for mortality and frailty among older adults2024 · 33 citations
  3. 3Small for gestational age and anthropometric body composition from early childhood to adulthood: the Aboriginal Birth Cohort study2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Relationship between adiposity and body size reveals limitations of BMI2005 · 394 citations
  5. 5Obese, overweight, desirable, ideal: Where to draw the line in 1986?1986 · 12 citations