This review highlights the role of x-ray computed tomography in studying phase change materials, suggesting potential improvements for thermal energy storage.
Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) based on phase change materials (PCMs) is receiving increasing interest since it offers high energy storage density while enabling the integration of variable renewable energies, hence boosting the transition towards a climate-neutral future. Despite the advantages that PCMs offer in providing a nearly isothermal solid–liquid phase transition, they still face some challenges that limit their deployment in real applications such as low thermal conductivity, phase separation, and supercooling, which affect charging and discharging rates. X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is a non-destructive imaging technique widely used in materials science for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of material microstructures and their evolution. Recent advances in laboratory-XCT instrumentation enabled short acquisition times on the order of tens of seconds which allows the investigation of dynamic processes in situ by time-lapse XCT measurements. These advances open new opportunities for revealing information on the morphology of solid–liquid PCMs. Despite the fact that XCT imaging has significant potential for energy research, its application in the field of PCMs is fairly new. A key enabler of applications of XCT to PCMs is the density difference between solid and liquid PCMs, which was found to be higher than 7% for all investigated PCMs. This enabled solid and liquid phases to be distinguished one from the other and properly quantified over time. The present work reviews the principles of laboratory-based XCT and the recent applications of XCT technology in the characterisation of PCMs, with emphasis on the study of the solid–liquid phase transition and validation of numerical PCM models by addressing the potentialities and challenges of XCT in PCM research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martinez-Garcia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: