This analysis reveals updated metrics for ozone and air mass exchange based on isentropic surface changes and observations.
Our previous study examined the stratosphere-troposphere exchange (STE) of air mass and ozone using ERA5 and MERRA2 reanalysis data and observations for 2007–2010. Their analysis applied a lower stratosphere mass budget approach, with the 380 K isentropic surface serving as the upper boundary of the lowermost stratosphere. This study employs a dynamic isentropic surface fitted to the tropical tropopause, providing an update to the results using the static 380 K boundary. Additionally, we improve the numerical scheme for deriving the mass of the lowermost stratosphere. Under this new framework, the air mass upward flux at the isentropic surface in the tropics increases from 19.3 × 109, 19.3 × 109, and 22.0 × 109 kg s−1 in our previous study to 21.9 × 109, 20.9 × 109, and 26.3 × 109 kg s−1 in the present study for ERA5, MERRA2, and observations, respectively. The global ozone fluxes across the fitted isentrope become −347.6, −362.5 and −368.4 Tg yr−1 as compared to −345.7, −359.5 and −335.6 Tg yr−1 at the 380 K level from our previous study for ERA5, MERRA2 and observations, respectively. The corresponding extratropical ozone fluxes are −539.3, −541.3 and −565.5 Tg yr−1 versus previous estimates of −538.1, −542.5 and −527.8 Tg yr−1. The increased role of tropical cirrus clouds near the tropopause is also highlighted under the updated framework in observations. The contribution of cloud heating to tropical air mass flux increases from 2.0% in our previous study to 8.2% in the present analysis, while for ozone, the corresponding contribution increases from 1.8% to 8.1%. We further show that the improved estimate of the change rate of mass in the lowermost stratosphere has an impact on seasonal ozone STE results from chemistry climate models presented in another of our previous studies. These findings provide new insights into the processes governing stratosphere-troposphere exchange.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hall et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: