Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis highlights effective engagement in housing and service centers to improve hepatitis care.
Introduction Hepatitis B and C (HBV/HCV) are bloodborne infections, with individuals who have histories of substance use and homelessness bearing a disproportionate risk. Long-standing difficulties in engaging these populations have made testing and treatment challenging. This retrospective observational study describes a community-based approach to HBV/HCV prevention and treatment, comparing the effectiveness of different engagement site types in reaching and engaging this high-need population. Methods GRASSROOTS HEALTH was launched in 2018 to improve HBV/HCV care by providing on-site testing, HBV vaccination, treatment navigation, and adherence support across various housing and drop-in centers. Outcomes were tracked through REDCap and analyzed by engagement site. Results GRASSROOTS HEALTH reached nearly 2000 clients, with the greatest needs for HCV treatment in drop-in centers and HBV vaccination in low-income/permanent supportive housing. All sites demonstrated a relatively high return on effort, as evidenced by the percentage of participants needing HBV vaccination or HCV/HBV treatment. Conclusion Engaging individuals through housing and service centers effectively reached a high-need community, with findings suggesting that different engagement points may enhance outreach based on the primary focus (HCV treatment vs HBV vaccination).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schick et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: