This analysis critiques claims on genetic decline in human performance, highlighting flaws in the mutational load argument.
Eugenic arguments are not a thing of the past. In 2016 geneticist Michael Lynch published an article in Genetics arguing that human mental and physical performance is declining at a rate of 1% per generation. This estimate is not based onmeasurements of performance, but on an argument from mutational load: medical interventions are relaxing selection on the human population which will lead to a buildup of deleterious mutations. This simple argument from mutational load is invalid. When the argument is made valid, it is not obvious that there are any significant consequences for human population health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew J. Maxwell (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: