Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals negative sentiment towards the boycott among Indonesian users on social media, indicating significant public engagement.
This study examines the sentiment of Indonesian users on the social media platform X regarding the boycott movement of Israeli products. The movement, rooted in the global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) campaign, reflects strong pro-Palestinian sentiment in Indonesia. Using sentiment analysis techniques, including VADER, 4,002 tweets from October 2023 to August 2024 were analyzed to classify sentiments as positive, negative, or neutral. Results reveal that 63% of tweets express negative sentiment, supporting the boycott movement; 33% indicate positive sentiment, opposing the movement; and 4% remain neutral. Peaks in tweet activity coincide with significant events, such as the Indonesian Ulema Council's fatwa and geopolitical developments. The study also explores factors influencing public engagement, including hashtag usage, timing, and influencer participation. Findings highlight the role of social media in shaping public opinion and mobilizing collective action while contributing to academic discourse on digital platforms as arenas for cultural and political expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waluyo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: