Retrospective cohort study evaluated clinical outcomes and safety of bleomycin-electrosclerotherapy, highlighting its effectiveness for lymphatic malformations.
Bleomycin-electrosclerotherapy (BEST) is a novel treatment for slow-flow vascular malformations (SFVMs), most studied in venous malformations. This study specifically evaluated its safety and clinical outcome in lymphatic/lymphatic-dominant lympho-venous malformations (LMs/ld-LVMs). A monocentric cohort with symptomatic LMs or ld-LVMs treated by BEST was retrospectively assessed. A treatment-specific, patient-reported questionnaire assessed overall clinical response (complete response: symptom-free, partial response: improved symptoms, no response: unchanged symptoms, progression of symptoms), subjective health-related quality of life (QoL; optimal, improved, unchanged, worsening), pain (numerical rating scale, NRS), and postprocedural skin discolouration (yes/no). Pre and postprocedural lesion size was measured in three planes on MRI. Twenty-seven treatments were performed in 20 patients with 14 LMs and six ld-LVMs (11 microcystic, five mixed, and four macrocystic subtypes). Patients received 1.4 ± 0.6 treatments with a median bleomycin dose of 7 mg (range 2-15 mg). After BEST, 7/20 (35%) patients reported complete response, 10/20 (50%) partial response, and 3/20 (15%) no response. Health-related QoL was stated as optimal in 10/20 (50%) and as improved in 4/20 (20%) patients. Median pain NRS was reduced from 6 (3-10) to 2 (0-6). Postprocedural skin discolouration occurred in 11/20 (55%) patients. Follow-up MR imaging revealed lesion size reduction from mean maximum volume of 793 cm3 (IQR 155-2199 cm3) to 548 cm3 (IQR 71-1059 cm3). Total complication rate (CIRSE grade 3-4) was 11.1%. No differences in all outcome parameters regarding LMs subtypes were assessed. BEST demonstrates efficacy and acceptable safety treating LMs and ld-LVMs, including challenging microcystic lesions previously considered difficult to treat. 3b, Retrospective Cohort Study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obereisenbuchner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: