Single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals expression patterns related to tooth agenesis in mouse molars, suggesting new therapeutic targets.
Objective: Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies was used to analyze the temporal expression characteristics of molecules associated with congenital tooth agenesis and dental hard tissues during mouse molar development, in order to construct a cell atlas spanning the entire developmental cycle from E13.5 to P7.5, and further to provide new evidence for elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying dental developmental disorders. Methods: scRNA-seq data of murine mandibular molar tooth germs at five developmental stages (E13.5, E14.5, E16.5, P3.5, P7.5) were obtained from the GEO database (accession: GSE189381). The Seurat pipeline was employed for quality control, data normalization, dimensionality reduction, and Harmony-based batch effect correction. Cellular subpopulations were identified through UMAP dimensionality reduction, while developmental trajectories were reconstructed using Monocle for pseudotime analysis. Results: scRNA-seq analysis profiling identified 27 distinct cellular clusters, which were annotated into twelve major cell types including epithelial cells, mesenchymal cells, and endothelial cells. Msx1 exhibited a bimodal expression pattern. Pax9 reached its peak at E14.5 and then gradually decreased. Eda had a low expression level with a diffuse distribution. In contrast, Amelx and Enam were barely expressed during the embryonic stage and were activated at P3.5. Dspp was ectopically highly expressed in epithelial cells from P3.5 to P7.5, while Dmp1 was specifically upregulated in mesenchymal cells at P7.5. Conclusions: The temporal expression patterns of key regulatory genes for tooth agenesis (Msx1, Pax9, Eda), ameloblast differentiation (Amelx, Enam), and odontoblast development (Dspp, Dmp1) during mouse molar development. These findings provide a theoretical foundation and potential therapeutic targets for deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying tooth agenesis and other developmental dental anomalies, paving the way for targeted clinical interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: