Qualitative meta-synthesis improves customer relationship management and integrates sustainability in organizations.
Objective: The primary objective of this research is to develop a comprehensive model for improving Customer Relationship Management (CRM) with sustainable development using a meta-synthesis approach. Methodology: This study employs a qualitative meta-synthesis method, utilizing the seven-step model proposed by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007). A systematic literature review was conducted, analyzing both Persian and English academic articles published between 2010 and 2023. A total of 602 articles were initially reviewed, with 54 high-quality studies selected for further analysis. Key data were extracted, coded, and synthesized using Atlas.ti software, leading to the identification of critical dimensions and indicators. Findings: The research identified four key dimensions, eight components, and 53 indicators critical for improving CRM with sustainable development. The identified dimensions include: (1) Knowledge Development (empowerment and development, information technology and knowledge); (2) Organizational Behavior (organizational citizenship behavior, organizational factors); (3) Market Environment (political and economic conditions, market and customer factors); and (4) Managerial Factors (performance and financial factors, managerial and strategic factors). These findings align with several previous studies, confirming the importance of integrating sustainability into CRM practices. Conclusion: The study presents a comprehensive model that integrates CRM with sustainability, providing a roadmap for organizations to enhance customer relationships while promoting long-term sustainability. The findings underscore the importance of knowledge development, organizational behavior, market adaptability, and effective managerial strategies in fostering sustainable CRM practices. The model serves as a strategic guide for businesses aiming to balance customer satisfaction, profitability, and sustainability goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yazdani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: