Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective case review identifies retinal detachment risk factors in KPro patients, suggesting closer monitoring for those with aniridia.
To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, management strategies, and visual outcomes of retinal detachment (RD) following Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 (KPro) implantation. Single-center, retrospective observational case series. Medical records of 157 eyes from 122 adult patients who underwent Boston Type 1 KPro implantation at a tertiary care center between 2008 and 2022 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years and postoperative follow-up of at least 1 year. Demographic data, preoperative characteristics, postoperative complications, and visual outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were conducted to identify significant risk factors for RD. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to evaluate time-to-event data. Of the 157 eyes that underwent Boston Type 1 KPro implantation, 27 eyes (17.2%) developed retinal detachment (RD), all within 8 years postoperatively (2 RD per 100 eye years). Aniridia was significantly associated with increased RD risk (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.23-6.70), while other preoperative diagnoses were not. Eyes with RD were more likely to experience hypotony (OR: 7.63; p<0.0001), choroidal detachment (OR: 7.67; p<0.0001), phthisis (OR: 7.69; p<0.0001), and other serious complications. Surgical intervention was possible in 16 of the 27 RD cases, with pneumatic retinopexy being the most common approach. Retinal detachment is a significant complication following KPro implantation, particularly in patients with aniridia. Postoperative hypotony and other inflammatory complications may contribute to increased RD risk and challenge surgical repair. Close monitoring of high-risk patients may help mitigate long-term visual morbidity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsliger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: