Retrospective review describes visual outcomes and timing of complications in keratoprosthesis implants, indicating the need for careful monitoring.
Purpose: To describe the visual, anatomical, and vitreoretinal (VR) outcomes after Boston Keratoprosthesis (BKpro) type I and type II implantation. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of BKpro surgeries at Massachusetts Eye and Ear between May 2016 and November 2024. Results: Ninety-one eyes from 89 patients (mean age: 67.9 ± 16.5 years) were analyzed. The median presenting visual acuity was 2.6 logMAR [range (R): 0.38 to 4.00] that improved to 1.18 (R: 0.00–4.00). Type I BKpros (80.2%) were more common than type II (19.8%). Median duration of follow-up was 37.5 months (IQR: 16.9–67.7). VR complications were noted in 61.5% of eyes—64.3% in type I and 50.0% in type II. Complications in descending incidence include retroprosthetic membrane (8.28 events/100 years), epiretinal membrane (6.62/100 eye-years), endophthalmitis (5.24/100 eye-years), retinal detachment (4.42/100 eye-years), cystoid macular edema (4.42/100 eye-years), vitreous hemorrhage (3.59/100 eye-years), vitritis (2.48/100 eye-years), and choroidal hemorrhage (0.83/100 eye-years). Of those with VR complications, 82% had one occur in the first year. Conclusions: Both type I and type II BKpros demonstrated improved visual acuity. However, VR complication rates are high, particularly in the first year, suggesting a need for close multidisciplinary monitoring. Treatment of these sequalae remains challenging with often needing multiple procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pandiri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: