Cross-sectional analysis shows aerobic fitness indices affect recovery of power output in females, suggesting %4mM is key.
This study examined the influence of two aerobic fitness indices (VO<inf>2</inf>max and [%4mM] i.e. the relative intensity [%VO<inf>2</inf>max] corresponding to a blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol·L-1) on the recovery of power output during repeated sprinting. Thirty female team players (age: 21.9 [2.9] y, body mass: 61.7 [5.4] kg, mean [standard deviation, SD]) took part in the study. VO<inf>2</inf>max and %4mM were assessed, and participants were divided into two groups in a cross-sectional design [well-trained (N.=15) or moderately trained (N.=15)] according to either VO<inf>2</inf>max (53.6 [3.4] vs. 47.6 [2.4] mL∙kg∙min-1, P<0.001) or %4mM (86.7 [3.8] vs. 77.9 [4.1] %, P<0.001). Participants performed two 30 s sprints interspersed with 2 min of rest on a non-motorized treadmill. Blood samples were taken at rest, pre- and immediately post-sprinting for lactate, pH, ammonia, and plasma volume determination. When groups were separated according to %4mM, well-trained participants demonstrated superior recovery of peak and mean power output (PPO: 86.2 [10.3] vs. 74.5 [6.8] %, P<0.001; MPO<inf>30</inf>: 84.0 [7.8], vs. 77.1 [5.2] %, P<0.001), respectively]. When groups were separated according to VO<inf>2</inf>max, there were no differences in the recovery of PPO (82.8 [10.1] vs. 77.7 [10.5] %, P=0.188) and MPO<inf>30</inf>: (82.6 [6.5] vs. 78.9 [8.1] %, P=0.186). Blood metabolic responses were similar in all conditions (P=0.220-0.604). The results suggest that %4mM is the most important aerobic fitness index for power output recovery during repeated sprint running.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsampoukos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: