Retrospective cohort study reveals higher odds of negative respiratory outcomes in older and Black breast cancer survivors, suggesting urgent clinical attention.
Background: Negative respiratory outcomes have been reported in people diagnosed with COVID-19. Breast cancer, the most common cancer diagnosed in women globally, is an important cancer to investigate regarding COVID-19 outcomes. We hypothesized that women with breast cancer and infected with COVID-19 would demonstrate a greater risk for negative respiratory outcomes than people without breast cancer. Objective: We sought to examine associations between breast cancer diagnosis, COVID-19 infection, and negative respiratory outcomes using an Oracle Real World dataset. Method: Horn and Gassaway’s Practice-Based Evidence Framework structured this retrospective cohort study. Regression analysis identified associations among negative respiratory outcomes and breast cancer and COVID-19 diagnosis. Associations between preexisting comorbidities and COVID-19 infection complications in the dataset were also examined. Results: Breast cancer and COVID-19 diagnoses significantly predict increased odds of developing a negative respiratory outcome (OR = 1.11, CI 1.01-1.23, P = .03). Additional predictors of negative respiratory outcomes include advanced age (OR = 4.88, CI 4.21-5.65, P < .001); Black race (OR = 1.19, CI 1.11-1.28, P < .001); history of emergency department visits (OR = 1.33, CI 1.27-1.40, P < .001); and history of respiratory illness (OR = 2.60, CI 2.41-2.81, P < .001). Race/ethnicity (Asian or Hispanic), age 20 to 34, and pre-index ischemic stroke or atrial fibrillation were not significantly associated with increased odds of negative respiratory outcomes. Conclusion: Black and older women with breast cancer are at increased risk of developing negative respiratory outcomes following a COVID-19 infection compared to younger and White women with breast cancer. Implications for clinical practice are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: